Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Aurora SDK

  1. #11

    Re: Aurora SDK

    Quote Originally Posted by kryton9
    Roberto, thanks lots of good info there. I got ebasic working as an sdk. I will work on Aurora next. It is different that the others. Ebasic is at the moment very compatible with ibasic pro. But it is supposed to change in time.

    Aurora is already quite different. You might want to look at Aurora, since you are a c/c++/asm guru. I think you will find aurora very interesting.
    I press my thumbs for you that it works out.

    About EBasic changing compatiblity; My guess is not. It is out now for allmost a year and no development in that direction. I think it will stay lib compatible for a long time. I'm not upset about it, because it makes life easier.

  2. #12
    thinBasic author ErosOlmi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Milan - Italy
    Age
    57
    Posts
    8,795
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: Aurora SDK

    I suspect EBasic is 99.99999% equal to IBasic.

    What's the 0.00001% difference?
    "E" <> "I"


    www.thinbasic.com | www.thinbasic.com/community/ | help.thinbasic.com
    Windows 10 Pro for Workstations 64bit - 32 GB - Intel(R) Xeon(R) W-10855M CPU @ 2.80GHz - NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

  3. #13

    Re: Aurora SDK

    Yes I agree, indeed funny story the switch from IBASIC to EBASIC.

    Roberto
    http://www.thinbasic.com

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Ionicwind (Aurora, EBasic) uncertain future ?
    By ErosOlmi in forum Shout Box Area
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 14-08-2007, 00:51

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •