Originally Posted by
Charles Pegge
Yes I am seriously thinking about it Roberto. Most of it is straightforward, but there are some ambiguities which require interpretation. The 1:1 correspondance with machine code is not perfect. There are also a large number of instructions and their permutations so I will try to automate the coding, by interpreting the data directly from the manuals to avoid human error.
But even an incomplete implementation, could be made easier to use than the static inline assemblers in PB and FB.
Bookmarks