Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Is there an ISO for the "Basic" standard?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Is there an ISO for the "Basic" standard?

    Is there an ISO for the "Basic" standard?

    I ask this why I downloaded some different Basic and a very simple code that works in one of them does not work in others
    Example is the concatenate
    Some use "&" others "+"
    I keep thinking about the case of
    A = 1: b = 2
    C = a & b "12", c = a + b "3",
    C = a + b "concatenate!?"
    Function recall

    Function as () as long
    Function = value output
    End function

    Function as () as long
    As = value out
    End function

    Function as () as long
    Return Value Out
    End function

    Some have goto and gosub, others do not
    Among other differences
    Base 0, base 1, mixed


    Apparently contrary to other languages, basic has no basis
    This takes the force of the language that although anyone "even I" can learn easily does not go forward for lack of standardization and what is written for one type of basic does not work on the other

    The right would be for programmers to love language to create a standardization page where they would be the basis for others to follow when writing their language interpreters or compilers
    Something like functions, variables and basic commands, declaration syntax, among other things, to even create a default oop for the own basic where it did not let the language ease awayn the other



    existe algum ISO para o padrão do "Basic" ?

    pergunto isso por que baixei alguns Basic diferentes e um codigo mesmo bem simples que funciona em um deles não funciona nos outros
    exemplo é o concatenar
    uns utilizam o "&" outros "+"
    fico pensando no caso de
    a=1:b=2
    c=a & b "12", c=a + b "3",
    c=a + b "concatenar !?"

    uns tem goto e gosub, outros não tem
    entre outras tantas diferenças

    pelo visto ao contrario de outras linguagens, basic não tem bases
    isso tira a força da linguagem que apesar de qualquer um "até mesmo eu" conseguir aprender facilmente acaba não indo a frente por falta de padronização e o que se escreve para um tipo de basic não funciona no outro

    o certo seria voces programadores amantes da linguagem criar uma pagina de padronização onde ficariam as base para outros seguirem quando forem escrever seus interpretadores ou compiladores da linguagem
    algo como funções ,variaveis e comandos basicos, sintaxe de declaração , entre outras coisas, até mesmo criar um oop padrão para o proprio basic onde não deixasse fugir a facilidade da linguagem
    Last edited by Edcronos; 22-01-2017 at 14:15.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-03-2016, 04:32
  2. basic.mindteq.com: "Users top rated" page
    By ErosOlmi in forum thinBasic where ...
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 26-05-2013, 02:29
  3. Last-Typed-Char: a very "basic" question
    By ReneMiner in forum thinBasic General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22-05-2013, 11:16
  4. News issues "Back to Basic"
    By 659_minifly in forum Other languages
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-08-2010, 19:32

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •