[font=courier new][size=8pt]I basically agree with it. But, I'm worried that we're entering an era where the struggle for survival will again be primitive, mortal combat over water, food, and good land. I think those with the money will be the safest. And how do people acquire lots of money? My bias, is that they usually do not get it fairly - if one person has a lot more, then usually many others must have less - money is an abstraction for resources, and resources are limited. In that case, maybe the most devious, political, and ruthless brains, those not bothered by conscience, will flourish. On the other hand, throughout history, in every era, they have flourished, if I am correct. Usually, those with scruples, who desire only what they need, have little power. In the future I envision, the flower who needs a special environment to blossom, will have trouble surviving, unless her daddy has lots of money. Money fixes all kinds of problems, yes?
I think one problem with psychiatrists, is that, they have the same emotional problems as everyone else. They also have subjective viewpoints, like everyone else. Therefore, in my opinion, every analysis they make, is partly distorted by their own problems. So, two psychiatrists might make different diagnoses of the same patient. Hopefully, the diagnoses would be similar. But, I don't think there's any guarantee. Western society still puts medical doctors on a pedestal, probably especially psychiatrists, who many seem to think are infallible. My experience with medical doctors generally, is that they are very similar to lawyers in both intelligence and personality. Do you think my observation is intended to be complimentary?
Dan
Bookmarks